Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 SO2D 573 - Ware v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.

Ware v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1974
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reed v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In reaching our decision in this case, we must follow the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court. Where there is a conflict in the evidence, the reviewing court should not reverse the judgment of the district court where there is evidence in the record which, when reasonably construed, supports the conclusions reached by the district judge. See Reed v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, (La.App., 3 Cir., 1960), 125 So.2d 465 , and cases therein cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.