Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 SW3D 135 - Ex Parte Crow

Ex Parte Crow’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Hernandez v. State · Manuel v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are rare, but include deficient conduct that results in the deprivation of an entire judicial proceeding, such as an appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “attempt to persuade us to exercise our discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.