Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 SW3D 494 - Johnson v. Commonwealth

Johnson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Gates · Barker v. Wingo · Jones v. Barnes · Florida v. JL

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While an informant’s veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge are all “relevant considerations in the totality of the circumstances analysis,” they are not conclusive and “a deficiency in one may be compensated for, in determining the overall reliability of a tip, by a strong showing as to the other, or by some other indicia of reliability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.