¶1 ORDER
¶2 The defendant, Elton Mullins, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of five counts of assault in the first degree, five counts of armed criminal action, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. On appeal, defendant argues *514 that the trial court erred by granting the State’s motion to strike a venireperson for cause.
¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).