Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 S.W.3d 575 - West v. Robinson

West v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland))

Relationships

Relies on Latham v. Castillo · Lone Star Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission · Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Perez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1. Plaintiff and Defendants have both sued each other in the above referenced matter. 2. The parties, however, have agreed and do hereby agree to arbitrate their disputes and dissolve the corporation to wit: Robinson, West & Gooden P.C.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This Court has held that 'this provision is mandatory, and the courts of appeals are not at liberty to disregard it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.