Huse v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 266th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Sutton v. United States · Sanders v. United States · Jones v. State · Ross v. State · Cortez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“promising performance that is likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction and that the actor does not intend to perform or knows will not be performed, except the failure to perform the promise in issue without other evidence of intent or knowledge is not sufficient proof that the actor did not intend to perform or knew the promise would not be performed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“failing to correct a false impression of law or fact that is likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction, that the actor previously created or confirmed by words or conduct, and that the actor does not now believe is true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.