Roth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1987
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fink v. City of Milwaukee · Koetting v. State · State ex rel. Sullivan v. City of Tomah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant could not be accused of one offense and convicted of another [citing case]. Under the provisions of sec. 7, art. I, of the state constitution . . . he was entitled to know the offense of which he was charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. La Fond v. State“In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. La Fond v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.