Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 ALA 408 - Webb v. Gray

Webb v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2011

18 state decisions

6019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klinck v. . Colby · Ferdon v. Dickens · O'Neal v. McKinna · Upton v. Hume · Pool v. Devers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When words are slanderous in themselves, the right to damages follows as a consequence from speaking in a slanderous way, because it is the incalculable tendency of slander to injure the person slandered, in his reputation, profession, trade, or business. “It would frequently be difficult to prove any pecuniary injury from slander, and always impossible to establish its full extent * * *. Therefore, when words are actionable in themselves, the law implies damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.