State v. Keyonnie’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. · Montano v. Superior Court Pima County · Smith v. Cada · Kunzler v. Pima County Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“¶ 15 Our ease law provides that only when police conduct interferes with both the defendant’s right to counsel and his ability to obtain exculpatory evidence is “[d]ismissal of the case with prejudice ... the appropriate remedy because the state’s action foreclosed a fair trial by preventing [the defendant] from collecting exculpatory evidence no longer available.” Correspondingly, when the interference with the defendant’s right to counsel does not impinge upon his ability to collect exculpatory evidence, the appropriate remedy is suppression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rumsey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.