Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 ARIZ 485 - State v. Keyonnie

State v. Keyonnie’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. · Montano v. Superior Court Pima County · Smith v. Cada · Kunzler v. Pima County Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “¶ 15 Our ease law provides that only when police conduct interferes with both the defendant’s right to counsel and his ability to obtain exculpatory evidence is “[d]ismissal of the case with prejudice ... the appropriate remedy because the state’s action foreclosed a fair trial by preventing [the defendant] from collecting exculpatory evidence no longer available.” Correspondingly, when the interference with the defendant’s right to counsel does not impinge upon his ability to collect exculpatory evidence, the appropriate remedy is suppression.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.