Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Ark. 584 - Bledsoe v. McKeowen

Bledsoe v. McKeowen’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1989

10 state decisions

40193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago B. & Q. R. v. Byron School Dist. No. 1 · Stephens v. School District No. 85 · Carpenter v. Leatherman · School District No. 36 v. School District No. 31 · 173 Mo. App. 239 - Mathes v. Switzer Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The proper interpretation of the language used in the act is that the board may consolidate the proposed territory into a new district if, in the judgment of the board, it would be to the best interest of all parties residing in the district as a whole, meaning, of course, a substantial majority of all the parties residing in the territory. The exercise of a sound discretion on the part of the board in the organization or formation of a new district upon proper petition does not mean that the board may greatly inconvenience, oppress or outrage any parties residing in any part of the territory. The true interpretation of the statute is that the wishes and convenience of a substantial majority in the whole territory should be respected, if, in doing so, it would not greatly harm the other parties affected.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.