Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Cal. 571 - Stone v. Daily

Stone v. Daily’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
November 1968
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1968

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

90191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bury v. Young · Kenniff v. Caulfield · Moore v. Trott · Kenney v. Parks · Wall v. Wall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon the foregoing facts it is plain that if the delivery which must be relied on in order to make the deed effective was the final delivery to the bank under the instructions indorsed upon the envelope, there was no such absolute delivery as must exist in order to give the instrument life. The instructions on the envelope determine the character of the delivery, and make it one conditional upon Daily surviving his wife. If he did not survive her, the deed was to be returned to her and the purpose for which this provision for a return to the grantor was made was very evidently that the déed should not take effect in the event of the grantee dying before the grantor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We, George L. Daily and Bebecca J. Daily, husband and wife, do hereby deposit this sealed envelope and its contents in the Bank of Lake, at Lakeport, Cal., and we and each of us do hereby instruct the said Bank of Lake to hold the said envelope and its contents so long as we may live; and during such time not to deliver the same to either of us nor to any other person, nor suffer the seals to be broken; upon the death of either of us to deliver the same to the survivor on demand. Dated, January 11, 1900.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.