181 Cal. App. 2d 190 - People v. Render’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 1967
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Mooney v. Holohan · People v. Kiihoa · 50 Cal. 2d 802 - People v. McShann · 52 Cal. 2d 330 - People v. Prewitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden placed on the prosecution is that of disclosure, rather than discovery. [Citation.] . . . [A] rule requiring the prosecution *Page 605 to locate and produce the informer as a witness in every case would be an unreasonable extension of the informer doctrine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The prosecution is not required to call any particular witness, nor to put on all the evidence relating to a charge so long as all material evidence bearing thereon is fairly presented in such a manner as to accord to the defendant a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.