Stein v. York’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 42 Cal. 3d 822 - Greenup v. Rodman · 27 Cal. 3d 489 - Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co. · Burtnett v. King · 51 Cal. 3d 1160 - In Re Marriage of Lippel · 111 Cal. App. 4th 527 - Finney v. Gomez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“renders the judgment void "] ( Burtnett ); see also Stein, supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at p. 326 , 105 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 ["a default judgment in an amount greater than the amount demanded is void and subject to either direct or collateral attack”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under section 580 actual notice of the damages sought is not sufficient; due process requires 'formal notice.' ... [C]onstructive notice of potential liability does not satisfy section 580.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he primary purpose of the section is to guarantee defaulting parties adequate notice of the maximum judgment that may be assessed against them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.