Noce v. Noce’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Darak v. Darak (1989), McGuinness v. McGuinness (1981)
92 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pasquariello v. Pasquariello · Sanchione v. Sanchione · Jacobsen v. Jacobsen · Bunche v. Bunche · Grinold v. Grinold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] party seeking modification must show `a substantial change in the circumstances of either party, occurring subsequent to the entry of the original CT Page 4840 decree, and not contemplated by the parties at that time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n general, the same sort of circumstances are relevant in deciding whether a decree may be modified as are relevant in making the initial order of alimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“broad discretion in deciding motions for modification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.