181 Conn. App. 648 - State v. Lamantia’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish · Strobel v. Strobel · Nunez v. United States · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The use of inferences based on circumstantial evidence is necessary because direct evidence of the accused's state of mind is rarely available.... Furthermore, it is a permissible, albeit not a necessary or mandatory, inference that a defendant intended the natural consequences of his voluntary conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.