In re Augspurger’s Empirical Analysis
181 F. 174 · 1909
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1976
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. Bank · 41 Tex. Civ. App. 106 - Katzenstein v. Reid, Murdock & Co. · In re A. B. Carton & Co. · In re Dresser · Mooney v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““obtained money or property on credit upon a materially false statement in writing, made by him to any person or his representative for the purpose of obtaining credit from such person.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If those claims were so far valid as to be scheduled by [defendant] under oath as valid debts and to share in the distribution of his estate, and they did so share without protest from him, they were so far bona fide that they should have been listed as obligations in any statement made by him as to his financial condition to obtain credit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.