Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 F.1d 667 - In re Roth & Appel

In re Roth & Appel’s Empirical Analysis

181 F. 667 · 1910

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 33 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2003 · most notably Central Trust Co. v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n (1916), Zavelo v. Reeves (1913)

41 federal appellate · 33 district · 9 state decisions

4501910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horace Dunbar v. Lottie E Dunbar · Wood v. Partridge · In re Eidemiller · Moch v. Market St. Nat. Bank · In re Ells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Debts oí the bankrupt may be proved and allowed against his estate which are (1) a fixed liability, as evidenced by a judgment or an instrument in writing, absolutely owing at the time of the filing of the petition against him, whether then payable or not, with any interest thereon which would have been recoverable at that date or with a rebate of interest upon such as were not then payable and did not bear interest; * * * (4) founded upon an open account, or upon a contract express or Implied; * * * “(b) Unliquidated claims against the bankrupt may, pursuant to application to the court, be liquidated in such manner as it shall direct, and may thereafter be proved and allowed against his estate.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We do not think that by the use of the language in section 63a it was intended to permit proof of contingent debts or liabilities or demands the valuation or estimation of which it was substantially impossible to prove.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “absolutely owing at the time of the filing of the' petition, etc.,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.