Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 F.2d 1012

Docket No. 12316.

Wilcox v. Woods

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

May 22, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1950.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-05-22

2 counsel of record

Relies on Porter v. Warner Holding Co. · Woods v. Richman · Brooks v. Woods

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-05-22

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; C. E. Beaumont, Judge.

Lela Wilcox, in pro. per.

Ed Dupree, Gen. Counsel, OHE., Leon J. Libeu, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Francis X. Riley, Sp. Lit. Atty., Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, BONE, and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

A careful consideration of the briefs, the record and the oral argument convinces us that the learned trial judge committed no error in this proceeding which would require a reversal of the judgment below. No new point of law is presented which should be discussed here. See Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 66 S.Ct. 1086, 90 L.Ed. 1332; Woods v. Richman, 9 Cir., 174 F.2d 614, and Brooks v. Woods, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 716. The judgment is affirmed.

/181/f2d/1012 · .json · Public domain