Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 F.2d 279

Docket No. 10014.

Matthew N. Mezzanotte v. Joseph E. Bruno and Daisy Hilleary

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 16, 1949. Decided Feb. 13, 1950.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1950

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. David I. Abse, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D.C., for appellee Bruno.

No appearance for appelle Hilleary.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PROCTOR, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the defendant (appellee) in an action by appellant to declare a trust and for accounting, etc., in connection with the purchase and sale of real estate. In our opinion the pleadings and relevant affidavits support the conclusion of the trial court that no trust relationship prevailed between the parties. As the suit was founded upon this basis, we think the court was right in entering its judgment for defendant. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

/181/f2d/279 · .json · Public domain