Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 F.2d 535

Docket No. 12287.

Casey v. Etter

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1950.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-04-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1950

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1W. J. Nixon, Bonners, Ferry, Idaho, Geo. W. Young, Spokane,,'Wash.,, for appellants.

¶2Wm. S. Hawkins, E. I- Miller, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for appellees.

¶3Before IiEALY, BONE, and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The questions raised on this appeal are purely factual. Appellees sued to recover the reasonable value of legal services allegedly rendered in negotiating a settlement for appellants in connection with claims asserted by them against one Adams. The jury returned a verdict for a portion of the fee sued for. Appellants contend that no services were performed by appel-lees on their behalf, that they are not indebted to appellees in any sum, and that in truth the relationship of attorney and client never existed between appellees and themselves. While the showing on these points was conflicting, there is ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

/181/f2d/535 · .json · Public domain