Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 F.2d 92

Docket No. 13100.

Jones v. Mayo

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1950.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-04-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1953

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Darr v. Burford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-04-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael C. Jones, Raiford, Florida, in pro. per.

¶2Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General, Reeves Bowen, Asst. Attorney General, for appellees.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and WALLER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In this .case the petitioner alleges in the petition for the writ of habeas corpus and states in argument that no application has been made to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the State Supreme Court which' denied his application for the writ of habeas corpus. Upon the authority of Darr v. Burford, 70 S.Ct. 587, the judgment of the District Court denying the application for the writ of habeas corpus is

¶6Affirmed.

/181/f2d/92 · .json · Public domain