Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 F.2d 967 - Howey v. Yellow Cab Co. (United States, Third-Party Appellant). Gutmann v. Yellow Cab Co. (United States, Third-Party Appellant)

Howey v. Yellow Cab Co. (United States, Third-Party Appellant). Gutmann v. Yellow Cab Co. (United States, Third-Party Appellant)’s Empirical Analysis

181 F.2d 967 · 1950

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1978 · most notably United States v. Yellow Cab Co. (1951), Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc. (1978)

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

190195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sherwood · United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering · National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc · Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon consideration of all these factors we conclude that the F. T. C. A. must be construed to have authorized suits against the United States not only when the United States was the sole or single defendant but also when the United States was joined with another defendant or defendants. Though there is room for doubt our conclusion expresses our best judgment in respect to the issue involved. But can contribution be exacted from the United States under the F. T. C. A. in the cases at bar? This is a closely allied question.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.