Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 F.3d 1198 - Walter v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United

Walter v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United’s Empirical Analysis

181 F.3d 1198 · 1999

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Okehi v. Security Bank of Bibb County (2001), 921 So. 2d 587 - Borden v. East-European Ins. Co. (2006)

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

170199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Madara v. Hall · Advanced Estimating System, Inc. v. Riney · Cheney v. Anchor Glass Container Corp. · Macklin v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “long-arm statute... specifically designed to subject out-of-state insurers who are unauthorized to do business in Florida to the jurisdiction of the Florida courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 921 So. 2d 587 - Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.
  2. “[t]he statute lists a number of acts which may subject an unauthorized insurer to the jurisdiction of the Florida courts by allowing substituted service of process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 921 So. 2d 587 - Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.
  3. “question the requirement that the policy be issued and delivered in Florida [to a Florida resident].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 884 So. 2d 233 - EAST-EUROPEAN INS. CO. v. Borden

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.