Sci Liquidating Corporation Sunrise Carpet Industries Inc v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company Hartford Casualty Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis
181 F.3d 1210 · 1999
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co. (2002), Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. Olin Corp. (2002)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Maniccia v. Brown · Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Georgia Court [in O'Dell ] concluded that the plaintiff's negligent retention claims also were not covered, because, among other things, the plaintiff `did not allege that those injuries were caused by an accident and thus were brought about by an "event.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“COVERAGE AFFORDED ANY OF [THE INSURED'S] EMPLOYEES TO 'BODILY INJURY' OR 'PERSONAL INJURY' ... TO OTHER EMPLOYEES ARISING OUT OF AND IN THE COURSE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This latitude extends to the Supreme Court's restatement of the issue or issues and the manner in which the answers are given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.