Ad/Sat v. Associated Press’s Empirical Analysis
181 F.3d 216 · 1999
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Todd v. Exxon Corp. (2001), Pepsico, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co. (2002)
36 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In economists' terms, two products or services are reasonably interchangeable where there is sufficient cross-elasticity of demand. Cross-elasticity of demand exists if consumers would respond to a slight increase in the price of one product by switching to another product.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) engaged in anticompetitive or predatory conduct with (2) specific intent to monopolize and (3) a dangerous probability of achieving monopoly power.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the sales of other producers substantially constrain the price-increasing ability of the hypothetical cartel, these others are part of the market.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.