Michael Holland’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase III (2006), Pinney Md
7 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Singleton v. Wulff · Caminetti v. United States · Russello v. United States · United States v. American Trucking Associations
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Eastern Enterprises can only be viewed as rendering a decision that Congress acted arbitrarily in imposing retroactive liability on a signatory to [National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements] in existence prior to those that promised lifetime health benefits to retired miners when that signatory made no promise of lifetime benefits, did not contribute to the problem that caused the funding shortfall for the promised lifetime benefits or to the need for such benefits, and was not put on notice by any governmental action during the relevant time period that it might be subjected to later liability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Generally, issues that were not raised in the district court will not be addressed on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Pinney Md · No. 06-4611“`there was strong precedent' prior to the change.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.