Hood v. Ryobi America Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
181 F.3d 608 · 1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2016
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Bair · Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. · Moran v. Fabergé, Inc. · 72 Md. App. 199 - Simpson v. Standard Container Co. · 59 Md. App. 408 - Anderson Banks v. Iron Hustler Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded; and a product bearing such a warning, which is safe for use if it is followed, is not in defective condition, nor is it unreasonably dangerous.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Maryland imposes no duty to predict that a consumer will violate clear, easily understandable safety warnings....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defeats any claim that the saw is defective in design.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.