United States v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis
181 F.3d 781 · 1999
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 207 Ill. 2d 231 - People v. Lampitok (2003), 371 Ill. App. 3d 382 - People v. Ward (2007)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Chimel v. California · Spinelli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person's criminal record [demonstrating multiple drug offenses] alone does not justify a search of his or her home[,]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“distinct from, but overlapped] with, an interest in enforcing the drug laws. Although the parole officer is interested in the parolee's rehabilitation, the officer is also charged with monitoring compliance with various restrictions, including restrictions on the use of drugs. As in this case, parole officers often Work closely with the police. Exempting evidence illegally obtained by a parole officer from the exclusionary rule would greatly increase the temptation to use the parole officer's broad authority to circumvent the Fourth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Reasonable suspicion is based on the totality of the circumstances and has been defined as requiring `articulable reasons' and `a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person ... of criminal activity.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.