181 F. Supp. 330 - Roark v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1393 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on Commercial Casualty Ins Co v. Consolidated Stone Co · Duval v. Bathrick · Barfield v. Zenith Tire & Rubber Co. · Lavietes v. Ferro Stamping & Mfg. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““§ 1393. Divisions; single defendant; defendants in different divisions “(a) Except as otherwise provided, any civil action, not of a local nature, against a single defendant in a district containing more than one division must be brought in the division where he resides. “(b) Any such action, against defendants residing in different divisions of the same district or different districts in the same State, may be brought in any of such divisions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.