Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 F. Supp. 2d 53 - Fetto v. Sergi

181 F. Supp. 2d 53 - Fetto v. Sergi’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

8 district ·

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1403 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1413 · 20 U.S.C. § 1414 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Warth v. Seldin · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The state education agency is a proper party to actions involving claims of systemic violations of the IDEA, as the state defendants acknowledge.”); Fetto v. Sergi, 181 F.Supp.2d 53, 72 (D.Conn.2001); see also M.T.V. v. Perdue, No.Civ.A. 1:03CV0468-CA, 2004 WL 3826047 , at (N.D.Ga. Feb. 3, 2004) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Such an argument would be beyond tenuous given VESID’s sole purpose in assisting the disabled. Rather, his challenge derives from VESID’s failure to provide him with tailored vocational services, which he terms as “reasonable accommodations,” because of the particular needs of his disability. While such particularized treatment among the many services provided by VESID to the disabled may be required under Title I, it is not necessarily required under the anti-discrimination provisions of the Rehabilitation Act, or by implication, the ADA. In reviewing Doe’s discrimination claims, therefore, it is important to bear in mind that the purposes of such statutes are to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability and to ensure evenhanded treatment between the disabled and the able-bodied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the [local school district] responsible for developing a child's IEP can look to noneducational agencies ... to pay for or provide those services they ... are otherwise responsible for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.