Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 ILL 633 - Mack v. McIntosh

Mack v. McIntosh’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
7
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2010

2 district · 15 state decisions

601899190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Distilled Spirits · Burton v. Perry · Lane v. Lesser · Hoyt v. Tuxbury · St. John v. Conger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When knowledge of the agent has heen acquired confidentially as attorney for a former client in a prior transaction the reason of the rule, that the principal is hound by the knowledge of his agent, eases."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.