Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Ind. App. 265 - Rhode v. State

181 Ind. App. 265 - Rhode v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
6
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zickefoose v. State · 49 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Melvin · Beeman v. State · 44 Wis. 2d 151 - State v. Carter · 283 Ill. App. 3d 188 - Ill. Bell Telephone v. Ill. Comm. Com'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) A person engages in conduct ‘recklessly’ if he engages in the conduct in plain, conscious, and unjustifiable disregard of harm that might result and the disregard of harm involves a substantial deviation from acceptable standards of conduct. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““35-42-2-2 Recklessness “Sec. 2. (a) A person who, recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally performs an act that creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person commits criminal recklessness, a Class B misdemeanor. However, the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the conduct includes the use of a vehicle or deadly weapon. “(b) A person who recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury on another person commits criminal recklessness, a Class D felony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. A person commits attempt if, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for commission of an offense, such person: 2. Intentionally does ... anything which ... is any step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in commission of an offense____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.