181 Ind. App. 63 - Lusher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Webb v. State (1983), 405 So. 2d 1314 - Sheffield v. Sheffield (1981)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · United States v. Harris · Commonwealth v. Caine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[Dlelay between the time of a criminal occurrence and indictment may constitute a violation of due process where the defendant demonstrates that he has suffered actual prejudice ... and that there was no justification for the delay.... This court has required the defendant to demonstrate both elements in order to successfully raise a due process challenge." (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webb v. State“The jurors were entitled to have the benefit of this evidence so they could make an informed judgment as to the weight to place on [the informer's] testimony. The accuracy of his testimony was the key element in the state's case against Lusher.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wesley v. State“[the credibility of a witness may be attacked by showing a defect of capacity in the witness to observe, remember or recount the matters testified about.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wesley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.