Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Ind. App. 98 - Rose v. Rose

181 Ind. App. 98 - Rose v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2017

12 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 168 Ind. App. 467 - Green v. Karol · 145 Ind. App. 479 - Dunbar v. DUNBAR · 165 Ind. App. 98 - Moe v. Koe · 171 Ind. App. 509 - In Re Marriage of Robbins · 152 Ind. App. 665 - Kreczmer v. Allied Construction Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion will be found only where the court's conclusion and judgment is an erroneous one, 'one clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court, or the reasonable, probable, and actual deductions to be drawn therefrom.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.