Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 KY 766 - McDaniel v. Commonwealth

McDaniel v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 1983 · most notably Gillis v. Commonwealth (1924), 156 F. Supp. 495 - United States v. Hoffa (1957)

38 state decisions

18019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Commonwealth · Penman v. Commonwealth · Samuels v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person accused of crime, however guilty he may be, or whatever the nature of the crime charged against him, is entitled to a fair opportunity to prepare and present his defense. It is not the purpose of the law to deny any person accused of crime of the high privilege of establishing his innocence. ■ And whenever it has appeared to this court that the accused was deprived of a reasonable opportunity to explain away his guilt or was forced into trial without reasonable opportunity for preparation, we have not failed to grant a new . trial. Because, however desirable in the interest of justice a speedy trial may be, it is of much greater importance that the law of the land should be administered in an orderly and deliberate way, so that every person arraigned for crime may have, in truth a fair trial.”'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.