Feinglos v. Weiner’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably Alston v. Forsythe (1961), State, Use of Taylor v. Barlly (1958)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quercia v. United States · Starr v. United States · Kelly v. Huber Baking Co. · Hussey v. Ryan · Rosenkovitz v. United Railways & Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We cannot put the trial judge in a straight jacket, and prescribe or adopt a formula to be used and followed by him. All that we can do is to decide whether he has properly stated the law of the case, and has fairly reviewed the evidence with the natural and logical deductions therefrom, so that the jury may have a clear view of the case, always reminding the jurors that they are the judges of the fact.” See also Larkin v. Smith, 183 Md. 274 , 37 A. 2d 340 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.