Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 MO 582 - State v. Edgen

State v. Edgen’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
6
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 1982

13 state decisions

40190419101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dewitt · State v. Krueger · State v. Wilkerson · State v. Torphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever shall in this state deal, play or practice, or be in any manner accessory to the dealing, playing or practicing of the confidence game or swindle known as three-card monte, or of any such game, play or practice, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars, and by confinement in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than five years.” (R. S. 21-930.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.