Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 MOAPP 461 - Stanley v. Whitlow

Stanley v. Whitlow’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 1990
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1990

14 state decisions

50191419201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eyerman v. Mount Sinai Cemetery Ass'n · Ballentine & Boone v. Mercer · Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Murphy v. Knights of Columbus Building Co. · Hiemenz v. Goerger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is no doubt true that one cannot declare upon an explicit contract and then recover as upon a quantum meruit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.