Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 MOAPP 611 - Sloan v. Paramore

Sloan v. Paramore’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1952
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1952

10 state decisions

4019141920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Behan · Howard v. Stillwell Bierce Manuf'G Co · Griffin v. . Colver · Bless v. Jenkins · Hammond v. Beeson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There can be no doubt that the rule of Hadley v. Baxendale, besides authorizing the recovery of such damages as normally result from the breach of the contract, authorizes, in addition, the recovery of such damages as may fairly be supposed to have entered into the contemplation of the parties when they made the contract — that is, such damages as might naturally be expected by them to follow the breach in the particular case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.