Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Mont. 242 - State v. Downing

State v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2003

12 state decisions

801979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Porter · In the Matter of Ratzlaff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce a valid sentence is imposed, the court lacks jurisdiction to vacate or modify it unless specifically authorized by statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once the decision was made to revoke defendant's suspended sentence, the District Court had the discretion to allow credit for the "good time" served by the defendant, but that is all. Section 95-2206(3), R.C.M. 1947. The District Court did not have the statutory authority to require defendant to serve sixty days in the Ravalli County Jail and another thirty-four months on a suspended sentence. Section 95-2206(6) did not permit this kind of modification. Accordingly, there was no authority for the District Court to grant the county attorney's petition to again revoke the suspended sentence. At this point, the District Court no longer has jurisdiction over the defendant and a sentence imposed at this time would be void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “revoke such suspension or impose sentence and order such person committed, or may, in his discretion, order the prisoner placed under the jurisdiction of the state board of pardons as provided by law, or retain such jurisdiction with this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.