Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 N.C. 166 - Gray v. Central Warehouse Co.

Gray v. Central Warehouse Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 1966
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1966

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

4019211930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Munn v. Illinois · United States of America v. American Tobacco Co. · Budd v. People of State of New York · Brass v. State of North Dakota Stoeser · People v. . Budd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Indeed, as far back as the history of the state extends, the business of tobacco warehouses has been, if not a public duty, always ‘affected with a public use.’ The laws of North Carolina from 1669 to 1790 have been compiled as State Records, vols. 23, 24 and 25, by the writer of this opinion [Chief Justice Clark], and in the index thereto, in the last named volume, it appears that no less than 75 statutes were enacted prior to 1790 in regard to tobacco warehouses requiring inspection, regulation, and fixing charges in such business. To the fullest extent, therefore, their regulation and control by the public has been recognized and enforced in this State. — In fact, there is no subject in which the protection of the producers against extortion and combinations to reduce prices is more important.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.