181 N.C. App. 152 - Foster v. Crandell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district · 37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 184 N.C. App. 455 - Strates Shows, Inc. v. Amusements of America, Inc. (2007), 210 N.C. App. 299 - Chidnese v. Chidnese (2011)
1 district · 37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Dickens v. Puryear · Collingwood v. GEN. ELEC. R. EST. EQUIT. · Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Caldwell v. Deese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not ... automatically entitle a party to an interlocutory appeal of an order rejecting”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Summary judgment is appropriate 'if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court reviews orders granting summary judgment de novo .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.