State v. Hodde’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burns v. Belafsky · State v. Valentin · In re Goldring · State v. Vick · State v. Federico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of theft if he knowingly receives or brings into this State movable property of another knowing that it has been stolen, or believing that it is probably stolen.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The third element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant either knew that the property had been stolen or believed that it had probably been stolen at the time the defendant received the property.... Mere proof that the property was stolen is not sufficient[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the State ... must prove that the property in question was actually stolen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.