State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
90
cited by 90 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 88 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Gregg v. Georgia · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“And for mixed questions of law and fact, we give deference . . . to the supported factual findings of the trial court, but review de novo the lower court's application of any legal rules to such factual findings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here the [PCR] court does not hold an evidentiary hearing, we may exercise de novo review over the factual inferences the trial court has drawn from the documentary record.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to conduct a de novo review of both the factual findings and legal conclusions of the PCR court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.