Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 NW2D 169 - State v. Rankin

State v. Rankin’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2022

20 state decisions

110197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Post · State v. Mayhew · State v. Martin · State v. Davis · State v. McCall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person should not be able to escape punishment for such a disgusting crime because he has chosen to take carnal knowledge of an infant too young to testify clearly as to the time and details of such shocking activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.