¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below, and question certified answered in the affirmative.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Olí. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray, J. ■
181 N.Y. 556
74 N.E 1120
Decided May 2, 1905
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1905-05-02
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 14, 1905, which reversed an order of Special Term directing a new taxation of costs in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The following question was certified : “ Is the plaintiff enti- ' tied to costs in this action accruing after the offer of judgment ? ”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1905-05-02
Cited by 11 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1981
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.