181 Ohio App. 3d 269 - State v. Householder’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 22 Ohio St. 3d 292 - State v. Plummer · State v. Steele · 138 Ohio App. 3d 562 - State v. Siegel · 82 Ohio App. 3d 39 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“accuracy of the test results can be adversely affected if the suspect either ingests material orally, like food or drink, or regurgitates material internally, by belching or vomiting, the suspect must be observed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lominack“with proof that she had ingested some substance. Moreover, ingestion has to be more than just”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lominack
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.