181 Ohio App. 3d 454 - State v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jury was free to accept or reject any and all of the evidence offered by the parties and assess the witness's credibility. 'While the jury may take note of the inconsistencies and resolve or discount them accordingly * * * such inconsistencies do not render defendant's conviction against the manifest weight or sufficiency of the evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Caulton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.