Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Okla. 425 - Sharp v. Oklahoma City

Sharp v. Oklahoma City’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2006

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

5019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los Angeles · Ex parte West · 37 Cal. App. 79 - People v. City of Lemoore · People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of Loyalton · Boise City v. Boise City Development Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the resident owners, of more than a majority of the whole number of acres included in such property particularly described in this ordinance, have given their written consent to the annexation of such property to the city of Oklahoma City,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he recitation above quoted raises a conclusive presumption in this kind of a case that the city council took evidence as to the residence and ownership of land of each signer of the petition and the amount owned by each.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * *, the law does not provide that territory added to the city limits shall be in compact form or in any particular shape.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.