State v. Drum’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 119 Wash. 2d 151 - Barnett v. Hicks · 93 Wash. 2d 301 - State v. Barton · State v. Ross · State v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: . . . I’ve got here a Drug Court Contract, Mr. Drum. Did you review that thoroughly with [your attorney]? MR. DRUM: Yes, I did. THE COURT: Do you understand what you’re getting into? MR. DRUM: Yes, I do. THE COURT: This is not an easy way to get out of a felony conviction. It requires a lot of effort on your part, and you’ll be under the scrutiny of the court for the next at least two years, do you understand that? MR. DRUM: Yes, I do. THE COURT: And that jail time will be imposed if you violate the conditions of your agreement with the court, and sometimes you end up getting more jail time in Drug Court than you would by pleading guilty, just because you can’t stay straight, you know that? MR. DRUM: Yes, I do.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Drum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.